netdev - Re: fq_codel and skb->hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1484771132.16328.1.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:25:32 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>
Cc:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: fq_codel and skb->hash

On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 13:21 -0700, Andrew Collins wrote:

> 
> Any interest in me spinning a real patch for this?  I agree that it'd be better
> if we were guaranteed to get a pre-encryption flow hash for any IPsec traffic,
> but in my particular case I don't care, as I control the HW and can make it give
> me a hash. :)

You certainly can send this as a patch of its own.

The pre-encryption flow hash would be a separate patch and is not a
prereq.

Thanks.