[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1484722923-7698-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:02:00 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, wexu@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next V5 0/3] vhost_net tx batching
Hi:
This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was
done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend
(e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and
submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation.
Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over
mlx4(noqueue) on host:
Mpps -+%
rx-frames = 0 0.91 +0%
rx-frames = 4 1.00 +9.8%
rx-frames = 8 1.00 +9.8%
rx-frames = 16 1.01 +10.9%
rx-frames = 32 1.07 +17.5%
rx-frames = 48 1.07 +17.5%
rx-frames = 64 1.08 +18.6%
rx-frames = 64 (no MSG_MORE) 0.91 +0%
Changes from V4:
- stick to NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT for rx-frames is user specify a value
greater than it.
Changes from V3:
- use ethtool instead of module parameter to control the maximum
number of batched packets
- avoid overhead when MSG_MORE were not set and no packet queued
Changes from V2:
- remove uselss queue limitation check (and we don't drop any packet now)
Changes from V1:
- drop NAPI handler since we don't use NAPI now
- fix the issues that may exceeds max pending of zerocopy
- more improvement on available buffer detection
- move the limitation of batched pacekts from vhost to tuntap
Please review.
Thanks
Jason Wang (3):
vhost: better detection of available buffers
vhost_net: tx batching
tun: rx batching
drivers/net/tun.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/vhost/net.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 8 ++++--
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists