[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170119162652.yef3ni6ylhzxpvgz@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:26:52 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DT <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>
Subject: Re: Initializing MAC address at run-time
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 04:31:56PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> Do you agree that such boot loader would execute code that is roughly
> identical to the one posted for illustration purposes?
> 1. find the MAC address to use for eth0
> 2. find the eth0 node in the DT
> 3. insert the right prop in the eth0 node
yes.
> In which case, it seems a waste to add the DT library to the boot
> loader, when the operation can be done in Linux, which requires the
> DT library anyway. (Additionally, adding DT support to some custom
> legacy boot loader might be a complex task.)
With this reasoning you can discuss away the bootloader. Linux relies on
a bootloader for a reason. It's there to initialize RAM and some further
things that Linux might not be able to and provide a machine description
to Linux (either in form of a dtb or an ATAG list) such that Linux
doesn't need to fiddle with machine specific stuff in early init code.
> > c) Adapt the dtb before it is written to the boot medium.
>
> This is not applicable, as the DTB is not written to the board.
Ah, then adapt the dtb before it is put into the tftp folder.
> > d) Let the bootloader configure the device and teach the driver to pick
> > up the mac from the device's address space.
>
> I'm not sure what you call "the device" ?
The network device. IIRC the fec driver checks if there is something
configured in the two registers configuring the MAC before falling back
to a random MAC.
> > e) Accept that the mac address is random during development, and make
> > Userspace configure the MAC address, which is early enough for
> > production use.
>
> During development, some devs configure the DHCP server to provide
> a specific uImage and/or rootfs to their board, based on the MAC
> address. This scheme would fall apart with a random MAC.
>
> > Not sure d) is considered ok today, but some drivers have this feature.
> > I'd say b) is the best choice.
>
> In my mind, doing it early in Linux is similar in spirit to doing it
> at the boot loader stage, in that it's neatly separated from the rest
> of the setup.
Sure you can do this. But it won't be accepted mainline for sure.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists