netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not recycle pages from emergency reserve

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG8DzzpO97ehxWAdm=18Hw3Q9N6poTviDYuEFgyc9+O9RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:14:36 +0200
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not recycle pages from emergency reserve

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> A driver using dev_alloc_page() must not reuse a page allocated from
> emergency memory reserve.
>
> Otherwise all packets using this page will be immediately dropped,
> unless for very specific sockets having SOCK_MEMALLOC bit set.
>
> This issue might be hard to debug, because only a fraction of received
> packets would be dropped.

Hi Eric,

When you say reuse, you mean point to the same page from several SKBs ?

Because in our page cache implementation we don't reuse pages that
already passed to the stack,
we just keep them in the page cache until the ref count drop back to
one, so we recycle them (i,e they will be re-used only when no one
else is using them).

on mlx5e rx re-post to the HW buffer we will call
mlx5e_page_alloc_mapped->mlx5e_rx_cache_get, and  mlx5e_rx_cache_get
will only return a page that is already freed by all stack users,
otherwise it will allocated a brand new one.

a page form mlx5e_page_cache can have one of 2 states
1. passed to the stack (not free)
2. free (already used and freed by the stack)

a non free page will never get reused for another SKB.

this is true for both mlx5 rx modes (striding and non-striding)

but in the striding mode regardless of page cache, small packets can
always fit in one page and this page can get pointed to by several
SKBs - should we be concerned about this case ?

Anyway, if you meant by this patch to avoid keeping such special pages
in the mlx5 page cache,
then it looks very good to me.

Thanks,
Saeed.

>
> Fixes: 4415a0319f92 ("net/mlx5e: Implement RX mapped page cache for page recycle")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> index 0e2fb3ed1790900ccdc0bbbef8bc5c33267df092..ce46409bde2736ea4d1246ca97855098f052f271 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static inline bool mlx5e_rx_cache_put(struct mlx5e_rq *rq,
>                 return false;
>         }
>
> +       if (unlikely(page_is_pfmemalloc(dma_info->page)))
> +               return false;
> +
>         cache->page_cache[cache->tail] = *dma_info;
>         cache->tail = tail_next;
>         return true;
>
>