netdev - Re: [PATCH] virtio: don't set VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4993cc72-54ab-a74d-cd39-034cff55613f@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:06:59 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Rolf Neugebauer <rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: don't set VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID on xmit



On 2017年01月18日 23:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:54:21AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2017年01月18日 02:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:13:51PM +0000, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>>>> This patch part reverts fd2a0437dc33 and e858fae2b0b8 which introduced a
>>>> subtle change in how the virtio_net flags are derived from the SKBs
>>>> ip_summed field.
>>>>
>>>> With the above commits, the flags are set to VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
>>>> when ip_summed == CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, thus treating it differently to
>>>> ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE, which should be the same.
>>>>
>>>> Further, the virtio spec 1.0 / CS04 explicitly says that
>>>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID must not be set by the driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rolf Neugebauer<rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>
>>> Fixes: fd2a0437dc33 ("virtio_net: introduce virtio_net_hdr_{from,to}_skb")
>>> Fixes: e858fae2b0b8 (" virtio_net: use common code for virtio_net_hdr and skb GSO conversion")
>>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@...hat.com>
>>>
>>> Should be backported into stable as well.
>> Looks like a side effect is that we will never see this on receive path?
> I thought receive path is using virtio_net_hdr_to_skb - isn't it?
>

The problem is tun use this on xmit.

Thanks