[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170119154817.26240372@griffin>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:48:17 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next V5] tc: flower: Refactor matching
flags to be more user friendly
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:27:53 +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Instead of "magic numbers" we can now specify each flag
> by name. Prefix of "no" (e.g nofrag) unsets the flag,
> otherwise it wil be set.
>
> Example:
> # add a flower filter that will drop fragmented packets
> tc filter add dev ens4f0 protocol ip parent ffff: \
> flower \
> src_mac e4:1d:2d:fd:8b:01 \
> dst_mac e4:1d:2d:fd:8b:02 \
> indev ens4f0 \
> ip_flags frag \
> action drop
>
> # add a flower filter that will drop non-fragmented packets
> tc filter add dev ens4f0 protocol ip parent ffff: \
> flower \
> src_mac e4:1d:2d:fd:8b:01 \
> dst_mac e4:1d:2d:fd:8b:02 \
> indev ens4f0 \
> ip_flags nofrag \
> action drop
>
> Fixes: 22a8f019891c ('tc: flower: support matching flags')
> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists