netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Don't forbid MDIO I/Os for PHY addr >= num_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87d1fi1oo0.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:54:39 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
        Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
        Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
        Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Don't forbid MDIO I/Os for PHY addr >= num_of_ports

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:

>> Isn't there an hardware table used to map the PHY addresses on such chip?
>
> The 6390 has something like this. But if we can avoid it, lets keep it
> KISS.

I definitely agree. I was just curious about this new chip.

Thanks,

        Vivien