[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1556c3a9-231c-bb4a-310e-0774c5c3018a@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:29:43 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Rolf Neugebauer <rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: don't set VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID on xmit
On 2017年01月20日 06:30, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2017年01月18日 23:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:54:21AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> On 2017年01月18日 02:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:13:51PM +0000, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>>>>>> This patch part reverts fd2a0437dc33 and e858fae2b0b8 which introduced a
>>>>>> subtle change in how the virtio_net flags are derived from the SKBs
>>>>>> ip_summed field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With the above commits, the flags are set to VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
>>>>>> when ip_summed == CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, thus treating it differently to
>>>>>> ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE, which should be the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Further, the virtio spec 1.0 / CS04 explicitly says that
>>>>>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID must not be set by the driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rolf Neugebauer<rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>
>>>>> Fixes: fd2a0437dc33 ("virtio_net: introduce virtio_net_hdr_{from,to}_skb")
>>>>> Fixes: e858fae2b0b8 (" virtio_net: use common code for virtio_net_hdr and skb GSO conversion")
>>>>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@...hat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be backported into stable as well.
>>>> Looks like a side effect is that we will never see this on receive path?
>>> I thought receive path is using virtio_net_hdr_to_skb - isn't it?
>>>
>> The problem is tun use this on xmit.
>>
>> Thanks
> Oh I missed that. I agree, let's add a flag that allows this.
>
Will post a fix soon.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists