[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484921912.786.1@smtp.office365.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:18:32 -0500
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <tom@...bertland.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: don't use sk_v6_rcv_saddr directly
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com> wrote:
> When comparing two sockets we need to use inet6_rcv_saddr so we get a
> NULL
> sk_v6_rcv_saddr if the socket isn't AF_INET6, otherwise our
> comparison function
> can be wrong.
>
> Fixes: 637bc8b ("inet: reset tb->fastreuseport when adding a
> reuseport sk")
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index 096a085..a336c42 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ int inet_rcv_saddr_equal(const struct sock *sk,
> const struct sock *sk2,
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> return ipv6_rcv_saddr_equal(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
> - &sk2->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
> + inet6_rcv_saddr(sk2),
> sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> sk2->sk_rcv_saddr,
> ipv6_only_sock(sk),
> --
> 2.5.5
Sorry I forgot to tag this, it's for net-next. Thanks,
Josef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists