netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Workaround missing PHY ID on mv88e6390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ziildzrc.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:26:31 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Workaround missing PHY ID on mv88e6390

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:

> The internal PHYs of the mv88e6390 do not have a model ID. Trap any
> calls to the ID register, and if it is zero, return the ID for the
> mv88e6390. The Marvell PHY driver can then bind to this ID.

This, in addition to the temperature code not working (despite what the
datasheet says) makes me wonder if this is intentional from Marvell. Do
we have a revision number for the 88E6390X's on the ZII Dev Rev C board?

It would be interesting to ask Gregory maybe about that. This looks not
"production-ready".

Other than that, I have no objection on the patch itself if that is
indeed expected from them...

Thanks,

        Vivien