netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make xfrm usable by 32-bit programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170123.104727.1594805087752706376.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:47:27 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc:     cernekee@...omium.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        paul@...l-moore.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...isplace.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, fw@...len.de, fan.du@...driver.com,
        dianders@...omium.org, dtor@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make xfrm usable by 32-bit programs

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:35:17 +0100

> So this creates new incompatibilities what is another argument against
> this approach. If you really need this, try to implement a full compat
> layer. I think this is the only sane solution for this.

A full compat layer is the only reasonable solution to this problem.