[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170122.232936.1713221615026642410.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 23:29:36 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: houjingj@...vell.com
Cc: jszhang@...vell.com, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and
.get_wol
From: Jingju Hou <houjingj@...vell.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:11:18 +0800
> The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> So pass the calls to the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou <houjingj@...vell.com>
> ---
> Since v2:
> - it should be phydev member not phy_dev
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index e05e227..fea4968 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -3908,6 +3908,25 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void
> +mvneta_ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> + wol->supported = 0;
> + wol->wolopts = 0;
> +
> + if (dev->phy_dev)
You are not testing the build of this patch, you are still using
phy_dev here. Either that or your commit message is not accurate.
Either way this patch or it's commit message is wrong.
I think you need to stop, take a deep breath, and take your time
fixing this.
Right now you are spitting out a new patch just minutes after
a previous submission, and these patches still have the same
bugs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists