netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: Keep a reference count on ethernet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa49f56d-db4b-dd18-7fe7-930526514dbf@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:56:39 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: Keep a reference count on ethernet_dev

On 01/24/2017 09:39 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:40:54 -0800
> 
>> of_find_net_device_by_node() just returns a reference to a net_device but does
>> not increment its reference count, which means that the master network device
>> can just vanish under our feet.
>>
>> Fixes: 83c0afaec7b7 ("net: dsa: Add new binding implementation")
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 
> This is fine, except now this netdev is completely locked into place with
> no way to dynamically unload it.
> 
> If someone tries to modunload the driver for this ethernet device,
> their screen will fill up with warning messages indicating that the
> reference taken here in the DSA code is not going away.
> 
> You need to implement a netdev notifier that tears down this DSA
> instance during an unregister event and releases the ethernet_dev.
> Similar to how we handle protocol addresses bound to a netdev, etc.

OK, that was actually my original approach, and then while detaching the
switch from the network device seemed easy enough, re-attaching it could
be a little challenging. Let's try again.

Thanks!
-- 
Florian