[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170124020950.GA72992@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:09:53 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Restrict cgroup bpf hooks to the init netns
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:36:08PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> To see how cgroup+bpf interacts with network namespaces, I wrote a
> little program called show_bind that calls getsockopt(...,
> SO_BINDTODEVICE, ...) and prints the result. It did this:
>
> # ./ip link add dev vrf0 type vrf table 10
> # ./ip vrf exec vrf0 ./show_bind
> Default binding is "vrf0"
> # ./ip vrf exec vrf0 unshare -n ./show_bind
> show_bind: getsockopt: No such device
>
> What's happening here is that "ip vrf" looks up vrf0's ifindex in
> the init netns and installs a hook that binds sockets to that
> ifindex. When the hook runs in a different netns, it sets
> sk_bound_dev_if to an ifindex from the wrong netns, resulting in
> incorrect behavior. In this particular example, the ifindex was 4
> and there was no ifindex 4 in the new netns. If there had been,
> this test would have malfunctioned differently
>
> Since it's rather late in the release cycle, let's punt. This patch
> makes it impossible to install cgroup+bpf hooks outside the init
> netns and makes them not run on sockets that aren't in the init
> netns.
>
> In a future release, it should be relatively straightforward to make
> these hooks be local to a netns and, if needed, to add a flag so
> that hooks can be made global if necessary. Global hooks should
> presumably be constrained so that they can't write to any ifindex
> fields.
>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> DaveM, this mitigates a bug in a feature that's new in 4.10, and the
> bug can be hit using current iproute2 -git. please consider this for
> -net.
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Fix the commit message. 'git commit' was very clever and thought that
> all the interesting bits of the test case were intended to be comments
> and stripped them. Whoops!
>
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index a515f7b007c6..a824f543de69 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,17 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(struct sock *sk,
> if (!sk || !sk_fullsock(sk))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * For now, socket bpf hooks attached to cgroups can only be
> + * installed in the init netns and only affect the init netns.
> + * This could be relaxed in the future once some semantic issues
> + * are resolved. For example, ifindexes belonging to one netns
> + * should probably not be visible to hooks installed by programs
> + * running in a different netns.
> + */
> + if (sock_net(sk) != &init_net)
> + return 0;
Nack.
Such check will create absolutely broken abi that we won't be able to fix later.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index e89acea22ecf..c0bbc55e244d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,17 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> struct cgroup *cgrp;
> enum bpf_prog_type ptype;
>
> + /*
> + * For now, socket bpf hooks attached to cgroups can only be
> + * installed in the init netns and only affect the init netns.
> + * This could be relaxed in the future once some semantic issues
> + * are resolved. For example, ifindexes belonging to one netns
> + * should probably not be visible to hooks installed by programs
> + * running in a different netns.
the comment is bogus and shows complete lack of understanding
how bpf is working and how it's being used.
See SKF_AD_IFINDEX that was in classic bpf forever.
> + */
> + if (current->nsproxy->net_ns != &init_net)
> + return -EINVAL;
this restriction I actually don't mind, since it indeed can be
relaxed later, but please make it proper with net_eq()
Powered by blists - more mailing lists