[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170125020249.GB24034@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:02:49 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for
ethernet switch 88E6341
> + [MV88E6341] = {
> + .prod_num = PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6341,
> + .family = MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341,
> + .name = "Marvell 88E6341",
> + .num_databases = 4096,
> + .num_ports = 6,
> + .port_base_addr = 0x10,
> + .global1_addr = 0x1b,
> + .age_time_coeff = 15000,
Hi Gregory
Please could you check this timer in the datasheet. There is currently
a bug in the mv88e6390 support code. I also set it to 15s. But in fact
it is 3.75 seconds. The 6341 might also use 3.75 seconds.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists