[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+sbYW2=Kfe6gUpiJTeLErXGTHzVacCYrWRNgewe9mJKH6ov4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:33:36 +0530
From: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>,
Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for bnxt_re V4 17/21] RDMA/bnxt_re: Handling dispatching
of events to IB stack
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> All callers to this function in this patch set qp_wait to be false.
> Do you have in following patches qp_wait == true?
> I'm curious because of your msleep below.
Thanks for pointing it out. Driver in our internal tree had one more
condition which has a qp_wait == true condition. I missed to remove
this before posting upstream. Will include this in V5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists