[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN3PR07MB2516DC52226DB57C29BC13F4C9770@BN3PR07MB2516.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:16:30 +0000
From: Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>
To: Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"harinikatakamlinux@...il.com" <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix 64 bit addressing support for GEM
-----Original Message-----
> From: Rafal Ozieblo [mailto:rafalo@...ence.com]
> Sent: 26 stycznia 2017 16:01
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix 64 bit addressing support for GEM
>
> This patch adds support for 32 bit GEM in
> 64 bit system. It checks capability at runtime
> and uses appropriate buffer descriptor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>
> ---
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> - if (GEM_BFEXT(DBWDEF, gem_readl(bp, DCFG1)) > GEM_DBW32)
> + if (GEM_BFEXT(DAW64, gem_readl(bp, DCFG6))) {
> + pr_emerg("rozieblo: 64B!\n");
I forgot to remove that log message.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists