lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <783c7683-1cc2-6128-e19c-fd2c3c16cf4b@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:44:31 -0600
From:   Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, wvoigt@...ibm.com,
        jallen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/5] ibmvnic: Fix MTU settings

On 01/25/2017 10:05 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:02:20 -0600
>
>> In the current driver, the MTU is set to the maximum value
>> capable for the backing device. This patch sets the MTU to the
>> default value for a Linux net device.
> Why are you doing this?
>
> What happens to users who depend upon the current behavior.
>
> They will break, and that isn't acceptable.
>
The current behavior was already broken.  We were seeing firmware errors when sending jumbo sized packets .  We plan to add proper support for jumbo sized packets as soon as possible.  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ