[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170129153536.GD2223@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:35:36 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Sudarsana Kalluru <Sudarsana.Kalluru@...ium.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] qede: Add driver support for PTP.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:28:23PM -0800, Sudarsana Kalluru wrote:
> +/**
> + * qede_ptp_adjfreq
> + * @ptp: the ptp clock structure
> + * @ppb: parts per billion adjustment from base
> + *
> + * Adjust the frequency of the ptp cycle counter by the
> + * indicated ppb from the base frequency.
> + */
> +static int qede_ptp_adjfreq(struct ptp_clock_info *info, s32 ppb)
> +{
> + struct qede_ptp *ptp = container_of(info, struct qede_ptp, clock_info);
> + struct qede_dev *edev = ptp->edev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + __qede_lock(edev);
> + if (edev->state == QEDE_STATE_OPEN) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&ptp->lock);
> + rc = ptp->ops->adjfreq(edev->cdev, ppb);
Why add this extra layer of indirection?
You could put these this test into qed_ptp_hw_adjfreq() and register
that function directly.
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ptp->lock);
> + } else {
> + DP_ERR(edev, "PTP adjfreq called while interface is down\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + __qede_unlock(edev);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists