[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130114530.GT30338@gauss.secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:45:30 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>, <ilant@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 2/2] xfrm: Add a dummy network device for
napi.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:53:49AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:46:38 -0800
>
> > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 08:19 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >> This patch adds a dummy network device so that we can
> >> use gro_cells for IPsec GRO. With this, we handle IPsec
> >> GRO with no impact on the generic networking code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> >> ---
> >> net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > That is nice ;)
>
> I like it too.
I've applied both to ipsec-next, thanks for all the feedback!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists