netdev - Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 02/14] net/ena: fix error handling when probe fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2017 00:14:31 +0200
From:   Netanel Belgazal <netanel@...apurnalabs.com>
To:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dwmw@...zon.com, zorik@...apurnalabs.com, alex@...apurnalabs.com,
        saeed@...apurnalabs.com, msw@...zon.com, aliguori@...zon.com,
        nafea@...apurnalabs.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 02/14] net/ena: fix error handling when probe
 fails

Hi,

You are right. I'll remove this patch.

Regards,

Netanel

On 01/28/2017 01:33 AM, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26.01.2017 23:18, Netanel Belgazal wrote:
>> When driver fails in probe, it will release all resources,
>> including adapter.
>> In case of probe failure, ena_remove should not try to
>> free the adapter resources.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Netanel Belgazal <netanel@...apurnalabs.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
>> index 7493ea3..cb60567 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
>> @@ -3046,6 +3046,7 @@ static int ena_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>  err_free_region:
>>      ena_release_bars(ena_dev, pdev);
>>  err_free_ena_dev:
>> +    pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>      vfree(ena_dev);
>>  err_disable_device:
>>      pci_disable_device(pdev);
>>
>
> Is this change really a "fix"? remove() should only be called if
> probe() has been successful before, otherwise not. Did you experience
> something different?
>
> Regards,
> Lino