[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CS1PR84MB00721E8E05290D70693B0EFECA4A0@CS1PR84MB0072.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:47:29 +0000
From: "Elluru, Krishna Mohan" <elluru.kri.mohan@....com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Elad Raz <e@...draz.com>
CC: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Yotam Gigi <yotamg@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [Patch net-next 2/2] netns: avoid disabling irq for netns id
HI Cong,
Have you posted any patch for the same? I am looking for single netlink socket to handle multiple network namespace events using NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID. I don't see detection of new namespaces by this socket yet and causing updates to be missed.
Thanks
Krishna Mohan.
-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Cong Wang
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 1:37 AM
To: Elad Raz <e@...draz.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>; David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>; Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>; Yotam Gigi <yotamg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next 2/2] netns: avoid disabling irq for netns id
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Elad Raz <e@...draz.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
> <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
>> Le 02/09/2016 à 06:53, Cong Wang a écrit :
>>> We never read or change netns id in hardirq context, the only place
>>> we read netns id in softirq context is in vxlan_xmit(). So, it
>>> should be enough to just disable BH.
>>
>> Are you sure? Did you audit all part of the code?
>> peernet2id() is called from netlink core system (do_one_broadcast()).
>> Are you sure that no driver call this function from an hard irq context?
>>
>> I think that NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID is largely untested, so it will
>> be hard to detect a bug introduced in this feature.
>
> I'm seeing strange things on our systems on boot time when trying to
> mount autofs.
> I bisected and got this patch as the bad one.
> I can see that only when I'm using "debug" config file.
Yeah, I saw the same report from SELinux developers, I am working on a fix.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists