[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170201.124433.584968147490170553.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:44:33 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc: linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, ecree@...arflare.com,
bkenward@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] sfc: a couple off by one bugs
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:50:40 +0300
> These checks are off by one. These are just sanity checks and we don't
> ever pass invalid values for "encap_type" so it's harmless.
>
> Fixes: 9b4108012517 ("sfc: insert catch-all filters for encapsulated traffic")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Please respin against net-next and Colin's fix.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists