[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1485984163.6360.160.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:22:43 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 13:16 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This would permanently leave the kernel in the netstamp_needed state.
>
> I would prefer the patch using a process context to perform the
> cleanup ? Note there is a race window, but probably not a big deal.
>
> net/core/dev.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Patch is not complete (for the HAVE_JUMP_LABEL=n case)
Would you like to author/submit it ?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists