[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC3K-4o-8CHAeBmuginKdAhqhDpm8uv+8wjksX8q2xF7UB3E=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:20:07 -0500
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>
To: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc: Zac Schroff <zachary.schroff@...adcom.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zac Schroff <zschroff@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: bgmac: init sequence bug
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl> wrote:
> On 2017-02-02 01:31, Zac Schroff wrote:
>>
>> How about BCMA_IOCTL_PRESERVE_ACROSS_INIT?
>
>
> I think wireless drivers may still set some these bits during init.
>
> I've a simpler idea: make it bgmac specific. Call it sth like
> BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_PRESERVE
> BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_RESERVED
> BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_DONT_TOUCH
Yes, I am listing out all of the fields in that register. We can be
intelligent about what we mask off :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists