[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:37:23 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com,
mlxsw@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
ivecera@...hat.com, jbenc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 19/19] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement TC flower
offload
On 02/02/2017 07:12 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> Extend the existing setup_tc ndo call and allow to offload cls_flower
> rules. Only limited set of dissector keys and actions are supported now.
> Use previously introduced ACL infrastructure to offload cls_flower rules
> to be processed in the HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> ---
> + tcf_exts_to_list(exts, &actions);
> + list_for_each_entry(a, &actions, list) {
> + if (is_tcf_gact_shot(a)) {
> + err = mlxsw_sp_acl_rulei_act_drop(rulei);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + } else if (is_tcf_mirred_egress_redirect(a)) {
> + int ifindex = tcf_mirred_ifindex(a);
> + struct net_device *out_dev;
> +
> + out_dev = __dev_get_by_index(dev_net(dev), ifindex);
> + if (out_dev == dev)
> + out_dev = NULL;
You are not checking here that out_dev has the same netdev_ops pointer
(unlike the matchall case), is that expected?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists