netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <388fcd93-2c4e-4dc6-db3c-2c1d361f032a@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:24:52 +0200
From:   "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
To:     Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@...il.com>
Cc:     jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api
 ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings

On 2/1/2017 00:01, Philippe Reynes wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On 1/31/17, Neftin, Sasha <sasha.neftin@...el.com> wrote:
>> Philippe,
>>
>> We will look into and try test this patch. I would like ask question. I
>> see that this thread has been started from implementation for e1000
>> code. Why do you decide shift implementation to e1000e?
> I've just sent two patch for two drivers (e1000 and e1000e).
>
>
>> Sasha
>>
>>
> Philippe

Hello Philippe,

Great. We are responsible for e1000e. We will check patch for e1000e.

Sasha