[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170202131741.GJ4967@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:17:41 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: marvell: Add support for 88e1545 PHY
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:55:16PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 2/2/2017 2:35 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> >The 88e1545 PHYs are discrete Marvell PHYs, found in a quad package on
> >the zii-devel-b board. Add support for it to the Marvell PHY driver.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> >---
> >
> >NOTE: To apply cleanly, the "Work around missing PHY product ID in mv88e6390"
> >patches need to be applied first.
> >
> >drivers/net/phy/marvell.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/marvell_phy.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c b/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
> >index 1a0ac48cbc50..f9d0fa315a47 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
> >@@ -2123,6 +2123,26 @@ static struct phy_driver marvell_drivers[] = {
> > .get_stats = marvell_get_stats,
> > },
> > {
> >+ .phy_id = MARVELL_PHY_ID_88E1545,
> >+ .phy_id_mask = MARVELL_PHY_ID_MASK,
> >+ .name = "Marvell 88E1545",
> >+ .probe = m88e1510_probe,
> >+ .remove = &marvell_remove,
> >+ .features = PHY_GBIT_FEATURES,
> >+ .flags = PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT,
> >+ .config_init = &marvell_config_init,
> >+ .config_aneg = &m88e1510_config_aneg,
> >+ .read_status = &marvell_read_status,
> >+ .ack_interrupt = &marvell_ack_interrupt,
> >+ .config_intr = &marvell_config_intr,
> >+ .did_interrupt = &m88e1121_did_interrupt,
> >+ .resume = &genphy_resume,
> >+ .suspend = &genphy_suspend,
> >+ .get_sset_count = marvell_get_sset_count,
> >+ .get_strings = marvell_get_strings,
> >+ .get_stats = marvell_get_stats,
>
> Using & on some method inits and not using it on others doesn't
> look very consistent...
Hi Sergei
Very true. I think it has been historically like that, and adding new
PHYs is mostly a cut/paste operation. With this list getting longer
all the time, i'm thinking we should start using some macros.
Are you O.K. with the patch as it is, and a follow-up series to follow
soon?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists