netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: get rid of custom busy polling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <437a945a-603b-1423-7f45-33ae62aef595@solarflare.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:14:04 +0000
From:   Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        Solarflare Linux Maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: get rid of custom busy polling code

On 03/02/17 01:13, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> In linux-4.5, busy polling was implemented in core
> NAPI stack, meaning that all custom implementation can
> be removed from drivers.
> 
> Not only we remove lot's of tricky code, we also remove
> one lock operation in fast path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
> Cc: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>

We were talking about doing this just yesterday.
Thanks Eric.

Acked-by: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>