netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] bnxt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:41:43 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To:     Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] bnxt_en: Add XDP support.

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:32:16 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 16:50:54 -0500 (EST), David Miller wrote:  
> >> We don't set precedence by one driver saying "hey it's better to do
> >> things this way, forget what all the other drivers are doing."  Rather
> >> we have a "discussion" about what the appropriate thing is to do and
> >> convert all the drivers only after a decision has been made.  
> >
> > Would making sure that if xdp_adjust_head() changes the starting offset
> > (and length) of frame and the program returns XDP_PASS - the stack will
> > see the changes made by xdp_adjust_head() fall under the same follow
> > the precedent rule?  That is what Martin did for mlx4 and mlx5, and what
> > John did in virtio, but not what this patch set does (see my comment on
> > patch 11).
> >
> > I should have double checked mlx4/mlx5 and made it clearer that there is
> > a precedent here in my review comment...  
> 
> Yes, I plan to also include this change (make modified offset and
> length visible to the stack) in the next version of the patch set.

Awesome, thanks!