[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170205153219.570425df@jawa>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 15:32:19 +0100
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Karicheri Muralidharan <m-karicheri2@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Engestrom <eric@...estrom.ch>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: dp83867: Port mirroring support in the
DP83867 TI's PHY driver
Hi Andrew,
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > This patch adds support for enabling or disabling the port
> > mirroring (at CFG4 register) feature of the DP83867 TI's PHY device.
>
> As we discussed before, "port mirroring" is bad naming. Yes, we should
> use it, because that is what the datasheet calls this feature.
That was my goal - to use naming from datasheet.
> But the
> commit message should also contain a description of what this means,
> and reference that the linux name for this concept is lane swapping.
Ok. No problem with that.
>
> > +enum {
>
> Maybe give the 0 value a name. DP83867_PORT_MIRROING_KEEP?
I can add this - no problem.
>
> > + DP83867_PORT_MIRROING_EN = 1,
> > + DP83867_PORT_MIRROING_DIS,
> > +};
> > +
>
> That extra enum value can then make this more obvious:
>
> if (dp83867->port_mirroring != DP83867_PORT_MIRROING_KEEP)
> dp83867_config_port_mirroring(phydev);
>
> On the first reading of the patch, i though you were setting mirroring
> on/off under all conditions, but in fact you don't. This makes it
> clearer.
Ok. I see your point.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
Thanks for review :-)
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@...x.de
Powered by blists - more mailing lists