netdev - [patch net-next 6/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Remove redundant check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1486394417-8011-7-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date:   Mon,  6 Feb 2017 16:20:15 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: [patch net-next 6/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Remove redundant check

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>

We only add neighbour entries that are also used for nexthops to
'nexthop_neighs_list', so when iterating over this list there's no need
to check that the entry is indeed used for nexthops.

Remove the redundant check.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index c338b08..98a6d03 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -847,13 +847,11 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_neighs_update_nh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
 	/* Take RTNL mutex here to prevent lists from changes */
 	rtnl_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry(neigh_entry, &mlxsw_sp->router.nexthop_neighs_list,
-			    nexthop_neighs_list_node) {
+			    nexthop_neighs_list_node)
 		/* If this neigh have nexthops, make the kernel think this neigh
 		 * is active regardless of the traffic.
 		 */
-		if (!list_empty(&neigh_entry->nexthop_list))
-			neigh_event_send(neigh_entry->key.n, NULL);
-	}
+		neigh_event_send(neigh_entry->key.n, NULL);
 	rtnl_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -897,11 +895,9 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_probe_unresolved_nexthops(struct work_struct *work)
 	 */
 	rtnl_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry(neigh_entry, &mlxsw_sp->router.nexthop_neighs_list,
-			    nexthop_neighs_list_node) {
-		if (!(neigh_entry->key.n->nud_state & NUD_VALID) &&
-		    !list_empty(&neigh_entry->nexthop_list))
+			    nexthop_neighs_list_node)
+		if (!(neigh_entry->key.n->nud_state & NUD_VALID))
 			neigh_event_send(neigh_entry->key.n, NULL);
-	}
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	mlxsw_core_schedule_dw(&mlxsw_sp->router.nexthop_probe_dw,
-- 
2.7.4