[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170206211226.GC3413@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:12:26 -0200
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "TCP: eth0: Driver has suspect GRO implementation, TCP
performance may be compromised." message with "ethtool -K eth0 gro off"
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 06:47:33AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 12:28 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>
> > Aren't you mixing the endpoints here? MSS is the largest amount of data
> > that the peer can receive in a single segment, and not how much it will
> > send. For the sending part, that depends on what the other peer
> > announced, and we can have 2 different MSS in a single connection, one
> > for each peer.
> >
> > If a peer later wants to send larger segments, it can, but it must
> > respect the mss advertised by the other peer during handshake.
> >
>
> I am not mixing endpoints, you are.
>
> If you need to be convinced, please grab :
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/723028/
>
> And just watch "ss -temoi ..."
I still don't get it, but I also hit the warning on my laptop, using
iwlwifi. Not sure what I did in order to trigger it, it was by accident.
Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists