netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: remove ath10k_vif_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 07 Feb 2017 06:46:47 -0800
From:   Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:     "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>,
        Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeusz.slawinski@...to.com>,
        "ath10k@...ts.infradead.org" <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: remove ath10k_vif_to_arvif()



On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org> writes:
>
>> Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in
>> FreeBSD is a different pointer.
>>
>> (Yes, I have ath10k on freebsd working and I'd like to find a way to
>> reduce the diff moving forward.)
>
> I don't like this "(void *) vif->drv_priv" style that much either but
> apparently it's commonly used in Linux wireless code and already parts
> of ath10k. So this patch just unifies the coding style.

Surely the code compiles to the same thing, so why add a patch that
makes it more difficult for Adrian and makes the code no easier to read
for the rest of us?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com