[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d4da3b4-d798-e55a-3988-647adbfd8413@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:33:52 +0000
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To: <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Performance in stmmac
Hi to all,
I finished implementing the multi-queue / multi-channel in stmmac and I am now
making some tests.
The mechanism is working properly, but the performance could be better
(~440Mb/s) :). For measuring I am using iperf:
synopsys@...2ipk1:~$ iperf -c 192.168.0.3 --port 5001 -t 20 -i 5
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.0.3, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.0.2 port 34272 connected with 192.168.0.3 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0- 5.0 sec 260 MBytes 436 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 5.0-10.0 sec 262 MBytes 440 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 10.0-15.0 sec 262 MBytes 440 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 15.0-20.0 sec 257 MBytes 431 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 0.0-20.0 sec 1.02 GBytes 437 Mbits/sec
I am seeing tx being performed in all queues, but rx is just being routed to
queue 0. The reason why only queue 0 is processing the packets is because I am
using priority tagged routing for now and iperf is not capable of producing
priority tagged traffic.
I am sending you this e-mail in order to know if you could suggest me a tool to
generate priority tagged traffic and if you have experience in tweaking stmmac
to improve performance.
Thanks,
Joao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists