[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1486496706.7793.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:45:06 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 5/5] esp: Add a software GRO codepath
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 10:14 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> This patch adds GRO ifrastructure and callbacks for ESP on
> ipv4 and ipv6.
>
I am a bit confused.
>
> -struct xfrm_tunnel_skb_cb {
> +/*
> + * This structure is used if we get the packet from the gro layer.
> + */
> +struct xfrm_gro_skb_cb {
> union {
> struct inet_skb_parm h4;
> struct inet6_skb_parm h6;
> - } header;
> +
> + struct {
> + __be32 seq;
> + bool skb_is_gro;
> + } input;
> + } gro;
> +};
> +
> +#define XFRM_GRO_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct xfrm_gro_skb_cb *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
> +
Then :
> +
> + x = xfrm_state_lookup(dev_net(skb->dev), skb->mark,
> + (xfrm_address_t *)&ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
> + spi, IPPROTO_ESP, AF_INET);
> + if (!x)
> + goto out;
> +
> + XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = NULL;
> + XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET;
> + XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->daddroff = offsetof(struct iphdr, daddr);
> + XFRM_GRO_SKB_CB(skb)->gro.input.seq = seq;
> + skb->sp->xvec[skb->sp->len++] = x;
> +
> + /* We don't need to handle errors from xfrm_input, it does all
> + * the error handling and frees the resources on error. */
> + xfrm_input(skb, IPPROTO_ESP, spi, -2);
> +
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINPROGRESS);
> +out:
> + skb_push(skb, offset);
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->same_flow = 0;
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush = 1;
> +
How can you mix XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(), XFRM_GRO_SKB_CB() and NAPI_GRO_CB()
at the same time on one skb ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists