| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:02:39 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 8/9] mlx4: use order-0 pages for RX
Use of order-3 pages is problematic in some cases.
This patch might add three kinds of regression :
1) a CPU performance regression, but we will add later page
recycling and performance should be back.
2) TCP receiver could grow its receive window slightly slower,
because skb->len/skb->truesize ratio will decrease.
This is mostly ok, we prefer being conservative to not risk OOM,
and eventually tune TCP better in the future.
This is consistent with other drivers using 2048 per ethernet frame.
3) Because we allocate one page per RX slot, we consume more
memory for the ring buffers. XDP already had this constraint anyway.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 72 +++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h | 4 --
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
index dd3bfcfea10c4545dfeda0f999449b13ca91..be4f3491a4fcb6ee0e9fe4e71abfd2bc5373 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
@@ -53,38 +53,26 @@
static int mlx4_alloc_pages(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
struct mlx4_en_rx_alloc *page_alloc,
const struct mlx4_en_frag_info *frag_info,
- gfp_t _gfp)
+ gfp_t gfp)
{
- int order;
struct page *page;
dma_addr_t dma;
- for (order = priv->rx_page_order; ;) {
- gfp_t gfp = _gfp;
-
- if (order)
- gfp |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC;
- page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
- if (likely(page))
- break;
- if (--order < 0 ||
- ((PAGE_SIZE << order) < frag_info->frag_size))
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- dma = dma_map_page(priv->ddev, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE << order,
- priv->dma_dir);
+ page = alloc_page(gfp);
+ if (unlikely(!page))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ dma = dma_map_page(priv->ddev, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE, priv->dma_dir);
if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(priv->ddev, dma))) {
put_page(page);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- page_alloc->page_size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
page_alloc->page = page;
page_alloc->dma = dma;
page_alloc->page_offset = 0;
/* Not doing get_page() for each frag is a big win
* on asymetric workloads. Note we can not use atomic_set().
*/
- page_ref_add(page, page_alloc->page_size / frag_info->frag_stride - 1);
+ page_ref_add(page, PAGE_SIZE / frag_info->frag_stride - 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -105,7 +93,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_alloc_frags(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
page_alloc[i].page_offset += frag_info->frag_stride;
if (page_alloc[i].page_offset + frag_info->frag_stride <=
- ring_alloc[i].page_size)
+ PAGE_SIZE)
continue;
if (unlikely(mlx4_alloc_pages(priv, &page_alloc[i],
@@ -127,11 +115,10 @@ static int mlx4_en_alloc_frags(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
while (i--) {
if (page_alloc[i].page != ring_alloc[i].page) {
dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, page_alloc[i].dma,
- page_alloc[i].page_size,
- priv->dma_dir);
+ PAGE_SIZE, priv->dma_dir);
page = page_alloc[i].page;
/* Revert changes done by mlx4_alloc_pages */
- page_ref_sub(page, page_alloc[i].page_size /
+ page_ref_sub(page, PAGE_SIZE /
priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride - 1);
put_page(page);
}
@@ -147,8 +134,8 @@ static void mlx4_en_free_frag(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
u32 next_frag_end = frags[i].page_offset + 2 * frag_info->frag_stride;
- if (next_frag_end > frags[i].page_size)
- dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, frags[i].dma, frags[i].page_size,
+ if (next_frag_end > PAGE_SIZE)
+ dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, frags[i].dma, PAGE_SIZE,
priv->dma_dir);
if (frags[i].page)
@@ -168,9 +155,8 @@ static int mlx4_en_init_allocator(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
frag_info, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_COLD))
goto out;
- en_dbg(DRV, priv, " frag %d allocator: - size:%d frags:%d\n",
- i, ring->page_alloc[i].page_size,
- page_ref_count(ring->page_alloc[i].page));
+ en_dbg(DRV, priv, " frag %d allocator: - frags:%d\n",
+ i, page_ref_count(ring->page_alloc[i].page));
}
return 0;
@@ -180,11 +166,10 @@ static int mlx4_en_init_allocator(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
page_alloc = &ring->page_alloc[i];
dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, page_alloc->dma,
- page_alloc->page_size,
- priv->dma_dir);
+ PAGE_SIZE, priv->dma_dir);
page = page_alloc->page;
/* Revert changes done by mlx4_alloc_pages */
- page_ref_sub(page, page_alloc->page_size /
+ page_ref_sub(page, PAGE_SIZE /
priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride - 1);
put_page(page);
page_alloc->page = NULL;
@@ -206,9 +191,9 @@ static void mlx4_en_destroy_allocator(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
i, page_count(page_alloc->page));
dma_unmap_page(priv->ddev, page_alloc->dma,
- page_alloc->page_size, priv->dma_dir);
+ PAGE_SIZE, priv->dma_dir);
while (page_alloc->page_offset + frag_info->frag_stride <
- page_alloc->page_size) {
+ PAGE_SIZE) {
put_page(page_alloc->page);
page_alloc->page_offset += frag_info->frag_stride;
}
@@ -1188,7 +1173,6 @@ void mlx4_en_calc_rx_buf(struct net_device *dev)
* This only works when num_frags == 1.
*/
if (priv->tx_ring_num[TX_XDP]) {
- priv->rx_page_order = 0;
priv->frag_info[0].frag_size = eff_mtu;
/* This will gain efficient xdp frame recycling at the
* expense of more costly truesize accounting
@@ -1198,22 +1182,32 @@ void mlx4_en_calc_rx_buf(struct net_device *dev)
priv->rx_headroom = XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
i = 1;
} else {
- int buf_size = 0;
+ int frag_size_max = 2048, buf_size = 0;
+
+ /* should not happen, right ? */
+ if (eff_mtu > PAGE_SIZE + (MLX4_EN_MAX_RX_FRAGS - 1) * 2048)
+ frag_size_max = PAGE_SIZE;
while (buf_size < eff_mtu) {
- int frag_size = eff_mtu - buf_size;
+ int frag_stride, frag_size = eff_mtu - buf_size;
+ int pad, nb;
if (i < MLX4_EN_MAX_RX_FRAGS - 1)
- frag_size = min(frag_size, 2048);
+ frag_size = min(frag_size, frag_size_max);
priv->frag_info[i].frag_size = frag_size;
+ frag_stride = ALIGN(frag_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+ /* We can only pack 2 1536-bytes frames in on 4K page
+ * Therefore, each frame would consume more bytes (truesize)
+ */
+ nb = PAGE_SIZE / frag_stride;
+ pad = (PAGE_SIZE - nb * frag_stride) / nb;
+ pad &= ~(SMP_CACHE_BYTES - 1);
+ priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride = frag_stride + pad;
- priv->frag_info[i].frag_stride = ALIGN(frag_size,
- SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
buf_size += frag_size;
i++;
}
- priv->rx_page_order = MLX4_EN_ALLOC_PREFER_ORDER;
priv->dma_dir = PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE;
priv->rx_headroom = 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h
index a5bb0103ad8fd3b3f4b3d16099b7bf7ba01b..4016086b13539c8bd848242a3a1788eff245 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h
@@ -102,8 +102,6 @@
/* Use the maximum between 16384 and a single page */
#define MLX4_EN_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_ALIGN(16384)
-#define MLX4_EN_ALLOC_PREFER_ORDER PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
-
#define MLX4_EN_MAX_RX_FRAGS 4
/* Maximum ring sizes */
@@ -255,7 +253,6 @@ struct mlx4_en_rx_alloc {
struct page *page;
dma_addr_t dma;
u32 page_offset;
- u32 page_size;
};
#define MLX4_EN_CACHE_SIZE (2 * NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT)
@@ -579,7 +576,6 @@ struct mlx4_en_priv {
u8 num_frags;
u8 log_rx_info;
u8 dma_dir;
- u8 rx_page_order;
u16 rx_headroom;
struct mlx4_en_tx_ring **tx_ring[MLX4_EN_NUM_TX_TYPES];
--
2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists