netdev - Re: [RFC v3 02/11] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface Controller (VNIC) interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:19:25 -0700
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:     "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
Cc:     dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dennis.dalessandro@...el.com,
        ira.weiny@...el.com, Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 02/11] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface Controller
 (VNIC) interface

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:06:30PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:

> >> 	IB_DEVICE_RAW_SCATTER_FCS		= (1ULL << 34),
> >>+	IB_DEVICE_RDMA_NETDEV_HFI_VNIC		= (1ULL << 35),
> >
> >What is this called HFI_VNIC anyhow? Shouldn't this be OPA_VNIC? There
> >is nothing really HFI specific, right?
> 
> Agreed, OPA_VNIC is more appropriate here. Will change it.

And probably lots of other places too.. :)


> >And this should be rn->dev_priv ?
> 
> Yah, both will result in same behavior. But yah, what you are suggesting
> will remove any confusion. Will change in next PATCH series.

Only because the struct has no members, as soon as someone adds
something it would go booom.

Jason