netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] qed: Add infrastructure for PTP support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BL2PR07MB230614EEE9044CA39444C69E8D430@BL2PR07MB2306.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 07:03:17 +0000
From:   "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Kalluru, Sudarsana" <Sudarsana.Kalluru@...ium.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] qed: Add infrastructure for PTP support.

> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:41:44AM +0000, Mintz, Yuval wrote:
> > Richard - we're planning on sending v4 with the existing algorithm
> > [but without iterating on 'val == 0']; If you have any suggestion for
> > improving this, please share it.
> 
> Sorry, haven't had the time to look at your issue.
> 
> BTW, you said you think the performance impact is small, but did you
> measure it on typical HW?

Can't say we've focused on performance testing for the feature,
but regular testing showed sane results.