[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d92d3afc-140f-8959-c6ea-9758eb1aa539@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:30:17 +0100
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: bridge: remove redundant check to see if
err is set
On 07/02/17 11:56, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The error check on err is redundant as it is being checked
> previously each time it has been updated. Remove this redundant
> check.
>
> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#140030("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index fc5d885..cdc4e2a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -612,9 +612,6 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br,
> return err;
> break;
> }
> -
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> }
>
> return err;
>
Actually that code can be reduced further, I'll follow up with a patch later.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists