[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <937450EB-BF9D-4963-B690-D6B58C8A197E@me.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:27:22 -0800
From: Denny Page <dennypage@...com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Extending socket timestamping API for NTP
> On Feb 07, 2017, at 21:27, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:52:52PM -0800, Denny Page wrote:
>> Most, but not all. The TI DP83630 doesn’t support timestamping for all packets, but it does support either PTP or NTP:
>
> That is the one and only device that explicitly supports NTP. This is
> a nice idea, of course, but it just did not take off among other
> products.
With a commonly available NTP implementation supporting hardware timestamping, this might get a bit more traction with manufacturers.
Denny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists