[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170208182038.GA14683@splinter.mtl.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:20:38 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <eladr@...lanox.com>, <mlxsw@...lanox.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 12/15] ipv4: fib: Notify about nexthop status
changes
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:05:54AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/8/17 8:32 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > In the case of multipath routes, if some of the nexthops can be
> > reflected, then we do so, but periodically ask the kernel to try and
> > resolve the others. Otherwise, these nexthops will never be resolved, as
> > the kernel doesn't see the packets hitting the multipath route and
> > therefore lacks the motivation to resolve its nexthops.
>
> It should get the motivation once the neigh entry is cleaned up. That
> can take a long time based on gc settings, but it can also happen from
> the remote side if it sends an arp message.
And when the remote side does that and the neighbour becomes valid we no
longer try to actively resolve it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists