[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170208.133744.558863839333233338.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:37:44 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: serebrin@...gle.com
Cc: borntraeger@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, venkateshs@...gle.com,
jonolson@...gle.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
rick.jones2@....com, jmattson@...gle.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] virtio: Fix affinity for #VCPUs != #queue
pairs
From: Ben Serebrin <serebrin@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:15:06 -0800
> If the number of virtio queue pairs is not equal to the
> number of VCPUs, the virtio guest driver doesn't assign
> any CPU affinity for the queue interrupts or the xps
> aggregation interrupt. (In contrast, the driver does assign
> both if the counts of VCPUs and queues are equal, which is a good
> default behavior.)
...
Can I get some reviews, please?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists