lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170208.160007.1721195899296415551.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:00:07 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:58:35 +0100

> Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:43:45PM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>>From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST)
>>
>>> Looks really nice, series applied, thanks!
>>
>>Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this.  And I am trying to fix
>>that up.
>>
>>I forgot to include patch #14, but I'll apply that now in the
>>mainline.
> 
> Yeah, the lost patch #14. I had to resend it to get it to patchwork.
> That's probably what confused your tools.
> 
> 
>>
>>I get a warning, in mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_create() because the
>>compiler thinks that 'nh' can be use uninitialized.  And I think
>>the compiler is pointing out something legitimate.
>>
>>This cleanup loop in err_nexthop_group_insert and err_nexthop_init
>>needs to take the 'nh' from &nh_grp->nexthops[i] instead of using
>>whatever is left in 'nh' for all mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fini() calls.
>>
>>So I'm going to augment the commit of patch #14 to make it go:
>>
>>@@ -1667,8 +1667,10 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct fib_info *fi)
>> 
>> err_nexthop_group_insert:
>> err_nexthop_init:
>>-	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>>+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>>+		nh = &nh_grp->nexthops[i];
>> 		mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fini(mlxsw_sp, nh);
>>+	}
>> 	kfree(nh_grp);
>> 	return ERR_PTR(err);
>> }
> 
> Oh. I did not catch is. But this is totally unrelated to this patchset.
> Please send it as a separate fix. Or I can do it if yo want.
> 
> Fixes: a7ff87acd995 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement next-hop routing")
> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

Sorry, I integrated it into the patch #14 commit, and it's already pushed
out.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ