lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:48:42 -0800 From: Denny Page <dennypage@...com> To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> Subject: Re: Extending socket timestamping API for NTP On Feb 07, 2017, at 21:27, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:52:52PM -0800, Denny Page wrote: >> Most, but not all. The TI DP83630 doesn’t support timestamping for all packets, but it does support either PTP or NTP: > > That is the one and only device that explicitly supports NTP. This is > a nice idea, of course, but it just did not take off among other > products. I have to say I haven’t gone looking for others, and will take your word regarding the DP83630 being the one and only. I only learned about the DP83630 because I have a couple of stratum 1 devices that use this phy and have been working with the vendor regarding integration of hardware timestamps for NTP. Denny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists