netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] xdp: Infrastructure to generalize XDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:17:06 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tom@...bertland.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] xdp: Infrastructure to generalize XDP

From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:41:20 -0800

> These hooks are also generic to allow for XDP/BPF programs as well
> as non-BPF code (e.g. kernel code can be written in a module).

I don't think we should even remotely consider surrendering the XDP
hook to module code.

We restrict it to eBPF for a reason, because that framework is
restricted in what it can do, what it can access, and how it can do
so.

Tom if you're going to do a cleanup that makes it so that drivers
need less code to support XDP, that is awesome but please do only
that.

Don't combine it with more controversial changes.

Thank you.