netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix susp/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170209.204507.954952367013216032.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 09 Feb 2017 20:45:07 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org
Cc:     mugunthanvnm@...com, grygorii.strashko@...com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, AStarikovskiy@...con.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix susp/resume

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:54:24 +0200

> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:21:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>> Date: Thu,  9 Feb 2017 02:07:34 +0200
>> 
>> > These two patches fix suspend/resume chain.
>> 
>> Patch 2 doesn't apply cleanly to the 'net' tree, please
>> respin this series.
> 
> Strange, I've just checked it on net-next/master, it was applied w/o any
> warnings.

It makes no sense to test "net-next" when I am telling you that it is
the "net" tree it doesn't apply to.

This is a bug fix, so it should be targetting the "net" tree.