netdev - Re: [patch net-next 00/10] mlxsw: Offload MC flood for unregister MC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170210.131217.414295442645332246.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:12:17 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com, ivecera@...hat.com,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/10] mlxsw: Offload MC flood for unregister
 MC

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Thu,  9 Feb 2017 14:54:39 +0100

> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> 
> Nogah says:
> 
> When multicast is enabled, the Linux bridge floods unregistered multicast
> packets only to ports connected to a multicast router. Devices capable of
> offloading the Linux bridge need to be made aware of such ports, for
> proper flooding behavior.
> On the other hand, when multicast is disabled, such packets should be
> flooded to all ports. This patchset aims to fix that, by offloading
> the multicast state and the list of multicast router ports.
> 
> The first 3 patches adds switchdev attributes to offload this data.
> The rest of the patchset add implementation for handling this data in the
> mlxsw driver.
> 
> The effects this data has on the MDB (namely, when the multicast is
> disabled the MDB should be considered as invalid, and when it is enabled, a
> packet that is flooded by it should also be flooded to the multicast
> routers ports) is subject of future work.
> 
> Testing of this patchset included:
> Sending 3 mc packets streams, LL, register and unregistered, and checking
> that they reached only to the ports that should have received them.
> The configs were:
> mc disabled, mc without mc router ports and mc with fixed router port.
> It was checked for vlan aware bridge, vlan unaware bridge and vlan unaware
> bridge with another vlan unaware bridge on the same machine

Series applied, thanks.