[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <589F4664.3060703@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:14:12 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag
On 02/11/2017 05:28 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
> to the given cgroup the descendent cgroup will be able to override
> effective bpf program that was inherited from this cgroup.
> By default it's not passed, therefore override is disallowed.
>
> Examples:
> 1.
> prog X attached to /A with default
> prog Y fails to attach to /A/B and /A/B/C
> Everything under /A runs prog X
>
> 2.
> prog X attached to /A with allow_override.
> prog Y fails to attach to /A/B with default (non-override)
> prog M attached to /A/B with allow_override.
> Everything under /A/B runs prog M only.
>
> 3.
> prog X attached to /A with allow_override.
> prog Y fails to attach to /A with default.
> The user has to detach first to switch the mode.
>
> In the future this behavior may be extended with a chain of
> non-overridable programs.
>
> Also fix the bug where detach from cgroup where nothing is attached
> was not throwing error. Return ENOENT in such case.
>
> Add several testcases and adjust libbpf.
>
> Fixes: 3007098494be ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Seems ok from my side:
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists