[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMhuG=B8UK3itxZc7hsVNZL2kBphpYpPm_Rc8WATQSH8iw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:07:44 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net] net/mlx5e: Add preemption enable/disable around
TC statistics upcall
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:21:25 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:38:43 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> >> Running with CONFIG_PREEMPT set, I get a
>> >>
>> >> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: tc/3793
>> >>
>> >> asserion from the TC action (mirred) stats_update callback, when the do
>> >>
>> >> _bstats_cpu_update(this_cpu_ptr(a->cpu_bstats), bytes, packets)
>> >>
>> >> As done by commit 66860be "nfp: bpf: allow offloaded filters to update stats",
>> >> disabling/enabling preemption around the TC upcall solves that.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: aad7e08d39bd ('net/mlx5e: Hardware offloaded flower filter statistics support')
>> >> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> I marked it as RFC, since I wasn't fully sure on the nature of the
>> >> problem, nor if this is the direction we should take to the fix.
>>
>> > I think it's the right fix
>>
>> Do you under the problem? what's wrong with the call done in the TC
>> action code w.r.t preemption?
>>
>> does it make sense to do this (say) 100K times/sec?
>
> TC actions have pre-cpu stats, referencing them has to be done with
> preemption disabled.
yeah, looking on Documentation/this_cpu_ops.txt I see they mention that, thanks!
I will re-submit the patch with the RFC mark dropped for net.
> Let's CC Jamal and Cong - maybe there are some
> more clever things we could do here? The situation in a nutshell is
> that the offload drivers read the stats from HW and want to write them
> back to the TC action stats. The writeback happens in process context
> when user requests stats dump (potentially for multiple actions but we
> currently would just iterate over all actions in driver code).
good, I will be happy to hear if Jamal/Cong/anyone has a suggestion how to maybe
generalize things here to make it more generic for offloading drivers to use.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists